[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]

Ask Daniel to provide proposed wording that: makes it explicit that function pointers are function objects at the beginning of [function.objects]; fixes the "requirements" for typedefs in [refwrap] to instead state that the function objects defined in that clause have these typedefs, but not that these typedefs are requirements on function objects; remove the wording that explicitly calls out that associative container comparators may be function pointers.