Issue 958 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Various threading bugs #8
Status
resolved
Section
[thread.condition.condvar]
Submitter
Pete Becker

Created on 2009-01-07.00:00:00 last changed 169 months ago

Messages

msg4562 (view)
Date: 2010-12-05.14:14:49

[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]

Mark as NAD EditorialResolved, addressed by resolution of Issue 859.

msg4561 (view)
Date: 2009-08-01.00:00:00

[ 2009-08-01 Howard adds: ]

I believe that 859 (currently Ready) addresses this issue, and that this issue should be marked NAD, solved by 859 (assuming it moves to WP).

msg4560 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Summit: ]

Move to open. Associate with LWG 859 and any other monotonic-clock related issues.

msg4559 (view)
Date: 2009-01-07.00:00:00

[thread.condition.condvar]: the specification for wait_for with no predicate has an effects clause that says it calls wait_until, and a returns clause that sets out in words how to determine the return value. Is this description of the return value subtly different from the description of the value returned by wait_until? Or should the effects clause and the returns clause be merged?

History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-05 14:14:49adminsetstatus: nad editorial -> resolved
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4562
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4561
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4560
2009-01-07 00:00:00admincreate