Title
system_clock::rep not specified
Status
nad editorial
Section
[time.clock.system]
Submitter
Pete Becker

Created on 2008-12-19.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago

Messages

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Proposed resolution:

Add a note to [time.clock.system], p2:

-2- system_clock::duration::min() < system_clock::duration::zero() shall be true. [Note: system_clock::rep shall be signed. -- end note].

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Batavia (2009-05): ]

We agree with the direction of the proposed resolution. Move to NAD Editorial.

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Howard adds: ]

This note refers to:

-2- system_clock::duration::min() < system_clock::duration::zero() shall be true.

I.e. this is standardeze for "system_clock::rep is signed". Perhaps an editorial note along the lines of:

-2- system_clock::duration::min() < system_clock::duration::zero() shall be true. [Note: system_clock::rep shall be signed. -- end note].

?

Date: 2008-12-19.00:00:00

In [time.clock.system], the declaration of system_clock::rep says "see below", but there is nothing below that describes it.

History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4487
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4486
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4485
2008-12-19 00:00:00admincreate