Created on 2008-09-15.00:00:00 last changed 161 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Modify [thread.once.callonce] p1-p2 with the following:
template<class Callable, class ...Args> void call_once(once_flag& flag, Callable&& func, Args&&... args);Given a function as follows:
template<typename T> typename decay<T>::type decay_copy(T&& v) { return std::forward<T>(v); }1 Requires:
The template parametersCallable and each Ti in Args shallbe CopyConstructible if an lvalue and otherwisesatisfy the MoveConstructible requirements. INVOKE(decay_copy(std::forward<Callable>(func),w1, w2, ..., wNdecay_copy(std::forward<Args>(args))...) ([func.require]) shall be a valid expressionfor some values w1, w2, ..., wN, where N == sizeof...(Args).2 Effects: Calls to call_once on the same once_flag object are serialized. If there has been a prior effective call to call_once on the same once_flag object, the call to call_once returns without invoking func. If there has been no prior effective call to call_once on the same once_flag object,
the argument func (or a copy thereof) is called as if by invoking func(args)INVOKE(decay_copy(std::forward<Callable>(func)), decay_copy(std::forward<Args>(args))...) is executed. The call to call_once is effective if and only iffunc(args)INVOKE(decay_copy(std::forward<Callable>(func)), decay_copy(std::forward<Args>(args))...) returns without throwing an exception. If an exception is thrown it is propagated to the caller.
[ 2010-02-12 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 5 postive votes on c++std-lib. ]
[ 2010-02-11 Anthony updates wording. ]
[ 2009-07 Frankfurt ]
Leave Open. Await decision for thread variadic constructor.
[ Post Summit Anthony provided proposed wording. ]
[ Summit: ]
Move to open.
I notice that the vararg overloads of std::thread and std::call_once (N2723 [thread.thread.constr] and [thread.once.callonce]) are no longer specified in terms of std::bind; instead, some of the std::bind wording has been inlined into the specification.
There are two problems with this.
First, the specification (and implementation) in terms of std::bind allows, for example:
std::thread th( f, 1, std::bind( g ) );
which executes f( 1, g() ) in a thread. This can be useful. The "inlined" formulation changes it to execute f( 1, bind(g) ) in a thread.
Second, assuming that we don't want the above, the specification has copied the wording
INVOKE(func, w1, w2, ..., wN) (20.6.2) shall be a valid expression for some values w1, w2, ..., wN
but this is not needed since we know that our argument list is args; it should simply be
INVOKE(func, args...) (20.6.2) shall be a valid expression
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2011-08-23 20:07:26 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++11 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4242 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4241 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4240 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4239 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4238 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4237 |
2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg4236 |
2008-09-15 00:00:00 | admin | create |