Title
Missing atomic exchange parameter
Status
resolved
Section
[atomics]
Submitter
Lawrence Crowl

Created on 2008-08-24.00:00:00 last changed 169 months ago

Messages

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Proposed resolution:

Add the appropriate parameters. For example,

bool atomic_exchange(volatile atomic_bool*, bool);
bool atomic_exchange_explicit(volatile atomic_bool*, bool, memory_order);
Date: 2010-12-05.14:14:49

[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]

NAD EditorialResolved. Solved by N2992.

Date: 2009-08-17.00:00:00

[ 2009-08-17 Handled by N2925. ]

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ 2009-07 Frankfurt ]

Lawrence will handle all issues relating to atomics in a single paper.

LWG will defer discussion on atomics until that paper appears.

Move to Open.

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Post Summit: ]

Lawrence: Need to write up a list for Pete with details.

Detlef: Should not be New, we already talked about in Concurrency group.

Recommend Open.

Date: 2008-08-24.00:00:00

The atomic_exchange and atomic_exchange_explicit functions seem to be inconsistently missing parameters.

History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-05 14:14:49adminsetstatus: nad editorial -> resolved
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4172
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4171
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4170
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4169
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg4168
2008-08-24 00:00:00admincreate