Issue 825 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Missing rvalues reference stream insert/extract operators?
Status
resolved
Section
[syserr.errcode.overview] [util.smartptr.shared.io] [facets.examples] [bitset.operators] [complex.ops] [stream.buffers] [re.submatch]
Submitter
Alisdair Meredith

Created on 2008-04-10.00:00:00 last changed 169 months ago

Messages

msg3937 (view)
Date: 2010-12-05.14:14:49

[ Batavia (2009-05): ]

The cited paper is an earlier version of N2844, which changed the rvalue reference binding rules. That paper includes generic templates operator<< and operator>> that adapt rvalue streams.

We therefore agree with Daniel's observation. Move to NAD EditorialResolved.

msg3936 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Daniel adds 2009-02-14: ]

The proposal given in the paper N2831 apparently resolves this issue.

msg3935 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ Sophia Antipolis ]

Agree with the idea in the issue, Alisdair to provide wording.

msg3934 (view)
Date: 2008-04-10.00:00:00

Addresses UK 220

Should the following use rvalues references to stream in insert/extract operators?

  • [syserr.errcode.overview]
  • [util.smartptr.shared.io]
  • [facets.examples]
  • [bitset.operators]
  • [complex.ops]
  • Doubled signatures in [stream.buffers] for character inserters (ref [ostream.inserters.character]) + definition [ostream.inserters.character]
  • [re.submatch]
History
Date User Action Args
2010-12-05 14:14:49adminsetstatus: nad editorial -> resolved
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg3937
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg3936
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg3935
2008-04-10 00:00:00admincreate