Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N5032.

1. Modify [meta.reflection.names] as indicated:

   consteval bool has_identifier(info r);

   -1- Returns:

   1. — [...]
   2. — Otherwise, if `r` represents a data member description (T,N,A,W,NUA) ([class.mem.general]); `true` if N is not ⊥. Otherwise, `false`.
   3. — Otherwise, `false`.

[ Croydon 2026-03-28; Status changed: Immediate → WP. ]

[ Croydon 2026-03-25; move to Immediate. ]

[ Croydon 2026-03-25; LWG adds wording ]

[ 2025-11-26; Reflector poll. ]

Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.

'value' and 'object' are missing too.

The `std::meta::has_identifier` metafunction doesn't say what it returns for an annotation. An annotation is not an entity, so it's not an unnamed entity, and it's also not a type, type alias, function, or any of the other things in the list.

We should add an item to the list for annotations, or just add a catch-all "Otherwise false" to the end of the list.