Issue 439 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Should facets be copyable?
Status
nad
Section
[locale.categories]
Submitter
Matt Austern

Created on 2003-11-02.00:00:00 last changed 184 months ago

Messages

msg2645 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Rationale:

The copy constructor in the base class is private.
msg2644 (view)
Date: 2003-11-02.00:00:00

The following facets classes have no copy constructors described in the standard, which, according to the standard, means that they are supposed to use the compiler-generated defaults. Default copy behavior is probably inappropriate. We should either make these classes uncopyable or else specify exactly what their constructors do.

Related issue: 421.

        ctype_base
        ctype
        ctype_byname
        ctype<char>
        ctype_byname<char>
        codecvt_base
        codecvt
        codecvt_byname
        num_get
        num_put
        numpunct
        numpunct_byname
        collate
        collate_byname
        time_base
        time_get
        time_get_byname
        time_put
        time_put_byname
        money_get
        money_put
        money_base
        moneypunct
        moneypunct_byname
        messages_base
        messages
        messages_byname
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg2645
2003-11-02 00:00:00admincreate