Created on 2024-11-22.00:00:00 last changed 3 days ago
[ 2025-02-07; Reflector poll ]
Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
We sometimes give detailed specifications of container members which add additional specification to the common requirements in [container.requirements.general], for example [vector.modifiers] defines `vector::erase` without actually saying it erases any elements. The actual effects of `erase` are given in [sequence.reqmts].
Authors of library wording often struggle with this non-local form of specification, where we sometimes do spell out container member functions in full, and sometimes rely on distant wording that applies to all containers. It would be easier if `vector::erase` referred back to [sequence.reqmts].
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2025-02-07 20:50:56 | admin | set | messages: + msg14590 |
2024-11-22 00:00:00 | admin | create |