Created on 2023-02-22.00:00:00 last changed 17 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4928.
Modify [util.smartptr.atomic.shared] as indicated:
[…]namespace std { template<class T> struct atomic<shared_ptr<T>> { […] constexpr atomic() noexcept; constexpr atomic(nullptr_t) noexcept : atomic() { } atomic(shared_ptr<T> desired) noexcept; atomic(const atomic&) = delete; void operator=(const atomic&) = delete; […] void operator=(shared_ptr<T> desired) noexcept; void operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept; […] private: shared_ptr<T> p; // exposition only }; }void operator=(shared_ptr<T> desired) noexcept;-5- Effects: Equivalent to store(desired).
void operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept;-?- Effects: Equivalent to store(nullptr).
[ 2023-06-17 Approved at June 2023 meeting in Varna. Status changed: Voting → WP. ]
[ 2023-03-22; Reflector poll ]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
[ 2023-02-25; Daniel comments and provides wording ]
The suggested delegation below to store(nullptr) is not ambiguous and calls the constructor shared_ptr(nullptr_t), which is guaranteed to be no-throwing.
LWG 3661, "constinit atomic<shared_ptr<T>> a(nullptr); should work" added the following to atomic<shared_ptr<T>>:
constexpr atomic(nullptr_t) noexcept : atomic() { }
I believe that doing so broke the following example:
atomic<shared_ptr<T>> a; a = nullptr;
For reference, atomic<shared_ptr<T>> provides two assignment operator overloads:
void operator=(const atomic&) = delete; // #1 void operator=(shared_ptr<T> desired) noexcept; // #2
Prior to LWG 3661, the assignment in the example unambiguously matches #2. #1 is not viable because nullptr_t is not convertible to atomic<shared_ptr<T>>. After LWG 3611, #1 is viable and the assignment is ambiguous between #1 and #2.
I believe this could be remedied easily enough by adding an assignment operator to match the added nullptr_t constructor:void operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept;
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2023-06-19 14:50:03 | admin | set | messages: + msg13646 |
2023-06-19 14:50:03 | admin | set | status: voting -> wp |
2023-06-12 08:52:25 | admin | set | status: ready -> voting |
2023-03-22 22:32:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg13468 |
2023-03-22 22:32:33 | admin | set | status: new -> ready |
2023-02-25 15:13:55 | admin | set | messages: + msg13433 |
2023-02-25 15:13:55 | admin | set | messages: + msg13432 |
2023-02-22 00:00:00 | admin | create |