Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4885.

1. Modify [format.arg] as indicated:

   namespace std {
     template<class Context>
     class basic_format_arg {
     public:
       class handle;
   
     private:
       using char_type = typename Context::char_type;                     // exposition only
   
       variant<monostate, bool, char_type,
         int, unsigned int, long long int, unsigned long long int,
         float, double, long double,
         const char_type*, basic_string_view<char_type>,
         const void*, handle> value;                                      // exposition only
   
       template<class T> explicit basic_format_arg(const T& v) noexcept;  // exposition only
       explicit basic_format_arg(float n) noexcept;                       // exposition only
       explicit basic_format_arg(double n) noexcept;                      // exposition only
       explicit basic_format_arg(long double n) noexcept;                 // exposition only
       explicit basic_format_arg(const char_type* s);                     // exposition only
   
       template<class traits>
         explicit basic_format_arg(
           basic_string_view<char_type, traits> s) noexcept;              // exposition only
   
       template<class traits, class Allocator>
         explicit basic_format_arg(
           const basic_string<char_type, traits, Allocator>& s) noexcept; // exposition only
       
       explicit basic_format_arg(nullptr_t) noexcept;                     // exposition only
   
       template<class T>
         explicit basic_format_arg(const T* p) noexcept;                  // exposition only
     public:
       basic_format_arg() noexcept;
   
       explicit operator bool() const noexcept;
     };
   }
   

   […]

   template<class T> explicit basic_format_arg(const T* p) noexcept;
   

   -12- Constraints: is_void_v<T> is true.

   -13- Effects: Initializes value with p.

   -14- [Note 1: Constructing basic_format_arg from a pointer to a member is ill-formed unless the user provides an enabled specialization of formatter for that pointer to member type. — end note]

[ 2021-06-07 Approved at June 2021 virtual plenary. Status changed: Voting → WP. ]

[ 2021-04-20; Reflector poll ]

Set status to Tentatively Ready after five votes in favour during reflector poll.

When P0645R10 "Text formatting" was merged into the draft standard, there was a typo: an exposition-only constructor of basic_format_arg is declared as accepting const T* in the class synopsis, but is later declared to accept T*. This was editorial issue 3461 and was resolved by adding const to the redeclaration.

As it is, constructing basic_format_arg from void* will select template<class T> explicit basic_format_arg(const T& v) and store a basic_format_arg::handle instead of select template<class T> basic_format_arg(const T*) and store a const void*, because void* → void*const& is identity conversion, while void* → const void* is qualification conversion.

While this technically works, it seems that storing a const void* would be more intuitive.

Hence, I think const should be removed from both declarations of basic_format_arg(const T*), so that construction from void* will select this constructor, resulting in more intuitive behavior.