Created on 2020-02-28.00:00:00 last changed 2 months ago
[ 2020-04-07 Issue Prioritization ]
Priority to 3 after reflector discussion.
"This TS does not define std::experimental::fundamentals_v3::pmr"
However, the TS then goes on to define exactly that namespace.At the time when the subclause memory.resource.syn was added, the IS didn't use to contain a namespace pmr. When the IS adopted that namespace and the TS was rebased, the namespace rule started conflicting with the material in the TS. I do not have a workable proposed resolution at this point.
|2020-04-07 17:51:56||admin||set||messages: + msg11207|