Created on 2020-02-25.00:00:00 last changed 42 months ago
[ 2021-05-18 Resolved by the adoption of P2259R1 at the February 2021 plenary. Status changed: New → Resolved. ]
[ 2020-03-29 Issue Prioritization ]
Priority to 2 after reflector discussion.
LWG 3291 makes changes to iota_view so that it no longer falsely claims it's a C++17 forward iterator. A side effect of this change is that the counted_iterator of an iota_view can no longer model forward_iterator, no matter what the properties of the underlying weakly_incrementable type are. For example, the following snippet is ill-formed after LWG 3291:
auto v = views::iota(0); auto i = counted_iterator{v.begin(), 5}; static_assert(random_access_iterator<decltype(i)>); // fails after LWG 3291
The problem seems to be that counted_iterator populates its iterator_traits but it does not specify its iterator_concept, so we fall back to looking at its iterator_category to determine its C++20 iterator-ness. It seems counted_iterator should specify its iterator_concept appropriately based on the iterator_concept of the iterator it wraps.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2021-05-18 09:43:39 | admin | set | messages: + msg11813 |
2021-05-18 09:43:39 | admin | set | status: new -> resolved |
2020-03-29 15:35:56 | admin | set | messages: + msg11176 |
2020-02-25 00:00:00 | admin | create |