Created on 2019-08-31.00:00:00 last changed 2 weeks ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4830.
Add a new sub-clause at the end of Clause [depr] as indicated:
D.?? Deprecated memory_order enumerators
-?- The following enumerators are declared in addition to those specified in [atomics.order]:namespace std { enum class memory_order : unspecified { memory_order_relaxed = relaxed, memory_order_consume = consume, memory_order_acquire = acquire, memory_order_release = release, memory_order_acq_rel = acq_rel, memory_order_seq_cst = seq_cst }; }
[ Brno 2026-06-12; Status changed: New → NAD. ]
LWG noted that two major implementations have removed these enumerators. One of them reported that they have not received any reports relating to this removal after 8 years. LWG does not believe that it is necessary to re-add these names to the standard.
[ 2019-10 Priority set to 4 after reflector discussion ]
P0439R0 renamed the std::memory_order enumerators when making it a scoped enumeration. The paper makes the old unscoped names available in the global namespace, but not within the scope of the enumeration.
For example: std::memory_order::memory_order_consume is no longer well-formed but std::memory_order::consume and std::memory_order_consume are. In order to prevent unnecessary breakage, we should re-add the memory_order_foo names to the enumeration.| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2026-06-15 13:21:36 | admin | set | messages: + msg16448 |
| 2026-06-15 13:21:36 | admin | set | status: new -> nad |
| 2019-10-07 02:21:30 | admin | set | messages: + msg10675 |
| 2019-08-31 16:52:58 | admin | set | messages: + msg10592 |
| 2019-08-31 00:00:00 | admin | create | |