Created on 2017-07-11.00:00:00 last changed 56 months ago
Rationale:
decay-copy after acceptance of P0758R1.[ 2020-05-03; Reflector discussions ]
Resolved by editorial action starting with N4800.
[ 2017-11-01 P3 as result of c++std-lib online vote. ]
[ 2017-07-16, Daniel comments ]
Currently there exists no proper way to mark decay_copy as conditionally noexcept as explained in N3255 section "Adding to the Standard". This is also slighly related to the request to add an is_nothrow_convertible trait, as requested by LWG 2040.
[thread.decaycopy] says:
In several places in this Clause the operation DECAY_COPY(x) is used. All such uses mean call the function decay_copy(x) and use the result, where decay_copy is defined as follows:
but decay_copy is not defined in any synopsis.
The Ranges TS has a similar use of DECAY_COPY, except that theirs is also constexpr and noexcept. We should mark the function decay_copy as "exposition only" and constexpr and noexcept.History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2020-05-03 19:53:58 | admin | set | messages: + msg11263 |
2019-03-22 17:54:23 | admin | set | messages: + msg10375 |
2019-03-22 17:54:23 | admin | set | messages: + msg10374 |
2019-03-22 17:54:23 | admin | set | status: new -> resolved |
2017-11-01 18:56:36 | admin | set | messages: + msg9494 |
2017-07-16 12:46:35 | admin | set | messages: + msg9404 |
2017-07-11 00:00:00 | admin | create |