Created on 2017-02-03.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This issue is a duplicate of LWG 2869.
[ 2017-02-03, Daniel comments ]
This issue unintentionally became added a second time, it should be considered as a pure duplicate of LWG 2869. By a wit of fortuity, both issues can also be transformed into each other by transposing the last two digits of the issue numbers.
The contents of <codecvt> are underspecified, and will take a reasonable amount of work to identify and correct all of the issues. There appears to be a general feeling that this is not the best way to address unicode transcoding in the first place, and this library component should be retired to Annex D, along side <strstream>, until a suitable replacement is standardized
Proposed change: Deprecate and move the whole of clause [locale.stdcvt] to Annex D.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-21 22:28:59 | admin | set | messages: + msg8970 |
| 2017-02-21 22:28:59 | admin | set | status: new -> dup |
| 2017-02-05 13:39:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg8933 |
| 2017-02-03 00:00:00 | admin | create | |