Title
Pass-through threshold for pool allocator
Status
new
Section
[mem.res.pool.options]
Submitter
Jens Maurer

Created on 2016-12-15.00:00:00 last changed 96 months ago

Messages

Date: 2017-01-27.00:00:00

[ 2017-01-27 Telecon ]

Priority 3; Jonathan will ask Alisdair for wording.

Date: 2016-12-15.00:00:00

[mem.res.pool.options] p3 talks about a "pass-through-threshold".

First, the phrase is not defined and it seems it could be easily avoided given the context.

Second, given the phrasing here, it seems the implementation is essentially allowed to ignore the value largest_required_pool_block as it sees fit. It is unclear whether that is the intention.

History
Date User Action Args
2017-01-30 15:36:02adminsetmessages: + msg8824
2016-12-15 00:00:00admincreate