Title
Use of "Equivalent to" in [strings]
Status
resolved
Section
[strings]
Submitter
Jeffrey Yasskin

Created on 2016-12-09.00:00:00 last changed 72 months ago

Messages

Date: 2017-01-27.00:00:00

[ 2017-01-27 Telecon ]

Priority 3; Marshall to provide wording.

Resolved by the adoption of P1148 in San Diego.

Date: 2016-12-09.00:00:00

Reported via editorial issue #165:

The following places should probably use the "Equivalent to" wording introduced in [structure.specifications]/4.

  1. [string.cons]/18

    Effects: Same as basic_string(il.begin(), il.end(), a).

  2. [string.capacity]/3

    Returns: size().

  3. [string.capacity]/8

    Effects: As if by resize(n, charT()).

  4. [string.capacity]/16

    Effects: Behaves as if the function calls: erase(begin(), end());

  5. [string.capacity]/17

    Returns: size() == 0.

  6. [string.insert]/27

    Effects: As if by insert(p, il.begin(), il.end()).

    Returns: An iterator which refers to the copy of the first inserted character, or p if i1 is empty.

History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-25 18:34:32adminsetstatus: new -> resolved
2017-01-30 15:36:02adminsetmessages: + msg8817
2016-12-09 00:00:00admincreate