Created on 2016-11-11.00:00:00 last changed 13 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4885.
Modify [expos.only.func] as indicated:
-2- The following are defined for exposition only to aid in the specification of the library:
namespace std { template<class T> constexpr decay_t<T> decay-copy(T&& v) noexcept(is_nothrow_convertible_v<T, decay_t<T>>) // exposition only { return std::forward<T>(v); } constexpr auto synth-three-way = []<class T, class U>(const T& t, const U& u) requires requires { { t < u } -> boolean-testable; { u < t } -> boolean-testable; } { if constexpr (three_way_comparable_with<T, U>) { return t <=> u; } else { if (t < u) return weak_ordering::less; if (u < t) return weak_ordering::greater; return weak_ordering::equivalent; } }; template<class T, class U=T> using synth-three-way-result = decltype(synth-three-way(declval<T&>(), declval<U&>())); }
Modify [contents] as indicated:
-3-
Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects: element for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.Whenever an unqualified name x is used in the specification of a declaration D in clauses 16-32 or Annex D, its meaning is established as-if by performing unqualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) in the context of D. [Note ?: Argument-dependent lookup is not performed. — end note] Similarly, the meaning of a qualified-id is established as-if by performing qualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.qual]) in the context of D. [Example: The reference to is_array_v in the specification of std::to_array ([array.creation]) refers to ::std::is_array_v. — end example] [Note ?: Operators in expressions ([over.match.oper]) are not so constrained; see [global.functions]. — end note]
Modify [range.subrange.general] as indicated:
template<class T> concept pair-like = // exposition only !is_reference_v<T> && requires(T t) { typename tuple_size<T>::type; // ensures tuple_size<T> is complete requires derived_from<tuple_size<T>, integral_constant<size_t, 2>>; typename tuple_element_t<0, remove_const_t<T>>; typename tuple_element_t<1, remove_const_t<T>>; { std::get<0>(t) } -> convertible_to<const tuple_element_t<0, T>&>; { std::get<1>(t) } -> convertible_to<const tuple_element_t<1, T>&>; };
Modify [range.elements.view] as indicated:
template<class T, size_t N> concept has-tuple-element = // exposition only requires(T t) { typename tuple_size<T>::type; requires N <tuple_size_v<T>; typename tuple_element_t<N, T>; { std::get<N>(t) } -> convertible_to<const tuple_element_t<N, T>&>; };
Modify [range.elements.iterator] as indicated:
-2- The member typedef-name iterator_category is defined if and only if Base models forward_range. In that case, iterator_category is defined as follows: […]
(2.1) — If std::get<N>(*current_) is an rvalue, iterator_category denotes input_iterator_tag.
[…]
static constexpr decltype(auto) get-element(const iterator_t<Base>& i); // exposition only-3- Effects: Equivalent to:
if constexpr (is_reference_v<range_reference_t<Base>>) { return std::get<N>(*i); } else { using E = remove_cv_t<tuple_element_t<N, range_reference_t<Base>>>; return static_cast<E>(std::get<N>(*i)); }
Remove [fs.req.namespace] in its entirety:
29.11.3.2 Namespaces and headers [fs.req.namespace]-1- Unless otherwise specified, references to entities described in subclause [filesystems] are assumed to be qualified with ::std::filesystem::.
[ 2021-06-07 Approved at June 2021 virtual plenary. Status changed: Voting → WP. ]
[ 2021-05-24; Reflector poll ]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
[ 2021-05-23; Daniel provides some additional tweaks to the updated proposed resolution ]
[ 2021-05-20; Jens Maurer provides an updated proposed resolution ]
[ 2020-11-22, Tim Song reopens ]
The references to get in [range.subrange.general] and [range.elements.view] need to be qualified as they would otherwise refer to std::ranges::get instead of std::get. Additionally, [expos.only.func] needs to clarify that the lookup there also takes place from within namespace std.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4868.
Modify [contents] as indicated:
-3-
Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects: element for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.Whenever an unqualified name x is used in the specification of a declaration D in clauses 16-32 or Annex D, its meaning is established as-if by performing unqualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) in the context of D. [Note ?: Argument-dependent lookup is not performed. — end note] Similarly, the meaning of a qualified-id is established as-if by performing qualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.qual]) in the context of D. [Example: The reference to is_array_v in the specification of std::to_array ([array.creation]) refers to ::std::is_array_v. — end example] [Note ?: Operators in expressions ([over.match.oper]) are not so constrained; see [global.functions]. — end note]Remove [fs.req.namespace] in its entirety:
29.11.3.2 Namespaces and headers [fs.req.namespace]-1- Unless otherwise specified, references to entities described in subclause [filesystems] are assumed to be qualified with ::std::filesystem::.
[ 2020-11-15; Reflector poll ]
Set priority status to Tentatively Ready after seven votes in favour during reflector discussions.
[ 2020-11-06; Reflector discussion ]
Casey suggests to insert "or Annex D" after "in clauses 16-32". This insertion has been performed during reflector discussions immediately because it seemed editorial.
[ 2020-11-04; Jens provides improved wording ]
[ 2020-10-02; Issue processing telecon: new wording from Jens ]
Use "Simplified suggestion" in 13 June 2020 email from Jens.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4849.
Modify [contents] as indicated:
-3-
Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects: element for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.Let x be a name specified by the standard library via a declaration in namespace std or in a subnamespace of namespace std. Whenever x is used as an unqualified name in a further specification, it is assumed to correspond to the same x that would be found via unqualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) performed at that point of use. Similarly, whenever x is used as a qualified name in a further specification, it is assumed to correspond to the same x that would be found via qualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.qual]) performed at that point of use. [Note: Such lookups can never fail in a well-formed program. — end note] [Example: If an Effects: element for a library function F specifies that library function G is to be used, the function ::std::G is intended. — end example]
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4849.
Modify [contents] as indicated:
Drafting note: Consider adding a note clarifying that the unqualified lookup does not perform ADL. -3-
Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects: element for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.Whenever an unqualified name x is used in the specification of a declaration D in clauses 16-32, its meaning is established as-if by performing unqualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) in the context of D. Similarly, the meaning of a qualified-id is established as-if by performing qualified name lookup ([basic.lookup.qual]) in the context of D. [Example: The reference to is_array_v in the specification of std::to_array ([array.creation]) refers to ::std::is_array_v. -- end example] [Note: Operators in expressions [over.match.oper] are not so constrained; see [global.functions]. -- end note]
[ 2020-02-14, Prague; Walter provides wording ]
[ 2019 Cologne Wednesday night ]
Geoffrey suggested editing [contents]/2 to mention the case when we're defining things in a sub-namespace.
Jonathan to word this.
[ Issues Telecon 16-Dec-2016 ]
Priority 2; Jonathan to provide wording
[contents]/3 says
Whenever a name x defined in the standard library is mentioned, the name x is assumed to be fully qualified as ::std::x, unless explicitly described otherwise. For example, if the Effects section for library function F is described as calling library function G, the function ::std::G is meant.
With the introduction of nested namespaces inside std, this rule needs tweaking. For instance, time_point_cast's Returns clause says "time_point<Clock, ToDuration>(duration_cast<ToDuration>(t.time_since_epoch()))"; that reference to duration_cast obviously means ::std::chrono::duration_cast, not ::std::duration_cast, which doesn't exist.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2023-11-22 15:47:43 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++23 |
2021-06-07 16:58:04 | admin | set | messages: + msg11882 |
2021-06-07 16:58:04 | admin | set | status: voting -> wp |
2021-05-26 21:11:22 | admin | set | status: ready -> voting |
2021-05-24 21:00:14 | admin | set | messages: + msg11850 |
2021-05-24 21:00:14 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
2021-05-23 18:59:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg11849 |
2021-05-22 21:02:49 | admin | set | messages: + msg11843 |
2020-11-22 13:27:34 | admin | set | messages: + msg11632 |
2020-11-22 13:27:34 | admin | set | status: ready -> open |
2020-11-15 13:49:21 | admin | set | messages: + msg11606 |
2020-11-15 13:49:21 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
2020-11-09 18:40:34 | admin | set | messages: + msg11531 |
2020-11-08 17:33:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg11530 |
2020-10-02 22:43:47 | admin | set | messages: + msg11504 |
2020-02-14 07:53:28 | admin | set | messages: + msg11100 |
2020-02-14 07:53:28 | admin | set | messages: + msg11099 |
2019-07-22 17:12:46 | admin | set | messages: + msg10486 |
2019-07-22 17:12:46 | admin | set | status: new -> open |
2016-12-16 20:56:38 | admin | set | messages: + msg8748 |
2016-11-11 00:00:00 | admin | create |