Created on 2016-03-21.00:00:00 last changed 89 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4582.
Edit [exclusive.scan]/2 as indicated:
[Drafting note: when i is result, [first, first + (i - result)) is an empty range, so the value to be assigned reduces to GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init), which is init, so there's no need to special case this.]
template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class T, class BinaryOperation> OutputIterator exclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, T init, BinaryOperation binary_op);-2- Effects: Assigns through each iterator i in [result, result + (last - first)) the value of GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result)).
init, if i is result, otherwise
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result) - 1).
Edit [inclusive.scan]/2 as indicated:
template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class BinaryOperation> OutputIterator inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, BinaryOperation binary_op); template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class BinaryOperation> OutputIterator inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, BinaryOperation binary_op, T init);-2- Effects: Assigns through each iterator i in [result, result + (last - first)) the value of
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result + 1)) if init is provided, or
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result + 1)) otherwise.
Edit [transform.exclusive.scan]/1 as indicated:
template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class UnaryOperation, class T, class BinaryOperation> OutputIterator transform_exclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, UnaryOperation unary_op, T init, BinaryOperation binary_op);-1- Effects: Assigns through each iterator i in [result, result + (last - first)) the value of GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, unary_op(*j), ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result)).
init, if i is result, otherwise
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, unary_op(*j), ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result) - 1).
Edit [transform.inclusive.scan]/1 as indicated:
template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class UnaryOperation, class BinaryOperation> OutputIterator transform_inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, UnaryOperation unary_op, BinaryOperation binary_op); template<class InputIterator, class OutputIterator, class UnaryOperation, class BinaryOperation, class T> OutputIterator transform_inclusive_scan(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, OutputIterator result, UnaryOperation unary_op, BinaryOperation binary_op, T init);-1- Effects: Assigns through each iterator i in [result, result + (last - first)) the value of
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, unary_op(*j), ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result + 1)) if init is provided, or
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, unary_op(*j), ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result + 1)) otherwise.
[ 2016-06 Oulu ]
Voted to Ready 11-0 Tuesday evening in Oulu
When P0024R2 changed the description of {inclusive,exclusive}_scan (and the transform_ version), it seems to have introduced an off-by-one error. Consider what N4582 [inclusive.scan]/2 says of inclusive_scan:
Effects: Assigns through each iterator i in [result, result + (last - first)) the value of
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result)) if init is provided, or
GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, *j, ...) for every j in [first, first + (i - result)) otherwise.
When i == result, i - result = 0, so the range [first, first + (i - result)) is [first, first) — which is empty. Thus according to the specification, we should assign GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, init) if init is provided, or GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op) otherwise, which doesn't seem "inclusive" — and isn't even defined in the second case.
The parallelism TS's version uses GENERALIZED_NONCOMMUTATIVE_SUM(binary_op, *first, ..., *(first + (i - result))) — which is a closed range, not a half-open one. Similar issues affect exclusive_scan, transform_inclusive_scan, and transform_exclusive_scan.History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2017-07-30 20:15:43 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++17 |
2016-06-28 12:55:35 | admin | set | status: immediate -> wp |
2016-06-27 16:44:20 | admin | set | messages: + msg8208 |
2016-06-27 16:44:20 | admin | set | status: new -> immediate |
2016-05-06 16:24:32 | admin | set | messages: + msg8075 |
2016-03-21 00:00:00 | admin | create |