Created on 2015-08-04.00:00:00 last changed 89 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4529.
Edit [func.wrap.func.con]/p2 as indicated:
-2- In the following descriptions, let ALLOCATOR_OF(f) be the allocator specified in the construction of function f, or
allocator<char>()the value of experimental::pmr::get_default_resource() at the time of the construction of f if no allocator was specified.
[ 2016-11-08, Issaquah ]
Adopted during NB comment resolution
[ 2015-10-26 ]
Daniel adjusts wording to lib. fund. v2.
Addresses: fund.ts.v2
According to the table in [memory.type.erased.allocator], if no allocator argument is specified at the time of construction, the memory resource pointer used is the value of experimental::pmr::get_default_resource() at the time of construction.
Yet in [func.wrap.func.con], ALLOCATOR_OF is specified to return allocator<char>() if no allocator was specified at the time of construction, which seems incorrect, especially as the user can change the default memory resource pointer to something other than new_delete_resource().
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2017-07-30 20:10:41 | admin | set | status: wp -> open |
2016-11-20 18:55:07 | admin | set | messages: + msg8649 |
2016-11-20 18:55:07 | admin | set | status: new -> wp |
2015-10-26 20:17:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg7586 |
2015-08-22 13:28:04 | admin | set | messages: + msg7504 |
2015-08-04 00:00:00 | admin | create |