Created on 2015-08-04.00:00:00 last changed 89 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4529.
Edit each of the synposes in [func.wrap.func], [futures.promise], and [futures.task] as indicated:
pmr::memory_resource* get_memory_resource() const noexcept;
[ 2016-11-08, Issaquah ]
Adopted during NB comment resolution
[ 2015-10-26 ]
Daniel adjusts wording to lib. fund. v2.
Addresses: fund.ts.v2
There doesn't seem to be any reason why this member function cannot be called on a const object, or why it would ever throw. I discussed this with Pablo Halpern, the author of N3916, and he agrees that this appears to have been an oversight.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2017-07-30 20:10:41 | admin | set | status: wp -> open |
2016-11-20 18:55:07 | admin | set | messages: + msg8648 |
2016-11-20 18:55:07 | admin | set | status: new -> wp |
2015-10-26 20:17:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg7584 |
2015-08-21 17:02:18 | admin | set | messages: + msg7500 |
2015-08-04 00:00:00 | admin | create |