Issue 2324: Insert iterator constructors should use addressof()

Title: Insert iterator constructors should use addressof()
Status: c++14
Section: [back.insert.iter.ops] [front.insert.iter.ops] [insert.iter.ops]
Submitter: Stephan T. Lavavej

Created on 2013-09-21.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago

Messages

msg6835 (view)

Date: 2014-02-13.06:35:03

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N3691.

Edit [back.insert.iter.cons]/1 as indicated:
```
explicit back_insert_iterator(Container& x);
```
-1- Effects: Initializes container with &xstd::addressof(x).
Edit [front.insert.iter.cons]/1 as indicated:
```
explicit front_insert_iterator(Container& x);
```
-1- Effects: Initializes container with &xstd::addressof(x).
Edit [insert.iter.cons]/1 as indicated:
```
insert_iterator(Container& x, typename Container::iterator i);
```
-1- Effects: Initializes container with &xstd::addressof(x) and iter with i.

msg6716 (view)

Date: 2014-02-13.06:35:03

[ Issaquah 2014-02-11: Move to Immediate ]

msg6715 (view)

Date: 2013-09-21.00:00:00

[back.insert.iter.cons]/1, [front.insert.iter.cons]/1, and [insert.iter.cons]/1 say "Initializes container with &x", which doesn't defend against containers overloading operator&(). Containers are now required to have such defenses for their elements, so we may as well be consistent here.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-02-27 17:03:20	admin	set	status: wp -> c++14
2014-02-20 13:52:38	admin	set	status: immediate -> wp
2014-02-13 06:35:03	admin	set	messages: + msg6835
2014-02-13 06:35:03	admin	set	status: new -> immediate
2013-10-11 21:22:24	admin	set	messages: + msg6716
2013-09-21 00:00:00	admin	create