Created on 2013-09-21.00:00:00 last changed 131 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N3691.
In [container.requirements.general]/7 change as indicated:
-7- Unless otherwise specified, all containers defined in this clause obtain memory using an allocator (see 17.6.3.5). Copy constructors for these container types obtain an allocator by calling allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_container_copy_construction on
their first parametersthe allocator belonging to the container being copied. Move constructors obtain an allocator by move construction from the allocator belonging to the container being moved. […]
[ Issaquah 2014-02-11: Move to Immediate ]
[container.requirements.general]/7 says "Copy constructors for these container types obtain an allocator by calling allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_container_copy_construction on their first parameters." However, [allocator.traits.members]/8 says that this takes const Alloc&, not a container. [container.requirements.general]/7 goes on to say "Move constructors obtain an allocator by move construction from the allocator belonging to the container being moved." so we can follow that wording.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-02-27 17:03:20 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++14 |
2014-02-20 13:52:38 | admin | set | status: immediate -> wp |
2014-02-13 15:14:54 | admin | set | messages: + msg6842 |
2014-02-13 15:14:54 | admin | set | status: new -> immediate |
2013-10-11 19:23:41 | admin | set | messages: + msg6708 |
2013-09-21 00:00:00 | admin | create |