Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N3691.

1. Change [new.delete.placement] as indicated:

   void* operator new(std::size_t size, void* ptr) noexcept;
   

   -?- Requires: ptr shall not be a null pointer.

   -2- Returns: ptr.

   -3- Remarks: Intentionally performs no other action.

   -4- [Example: This can be useful for constructing an object at a known address:

   void* place = operator new(sizeof(Something));
   Something* p = new (place) Something();
   

   — end example]

   void* operator new[](std::size_t size, void* ptr) noexcept;
   

   -?- Requires: ptr shall not be a null pointer.

   -5- Returns: ptr.

   -6- Remarks: Intentionally performs no other action.

[ 2014-02-15 post-Issaquah session : move to Tentatively NAD ]

AJM to supply the rationale...

Based on this discussion and as discussed in c++std-core-23998 and c++std-lib-34442, calling placement new currently forces the compiler to check if the pointer is null before initializing the object (a non-negligible cost). It seems many people were not aware of this and they consider it a user error to pass a null pointer to it.

Proposed resolution: for operator new and operator new[], add:

Requires: ptr shall not be a null pointer.