Created on 2013-06-26.00:00:00 last changed 138 months ago
Consider the following code snippet:
#include <vector> #include <algorithm> int main() { std::vector<int> v1(100, 3); std::vector<int> v2(100); copy(v1.begin(), v1.end(), v2.begin()); }
It compiles without error on my desktop. Is it required to? I can't find evidence from the standard that it is. In my test std::copy was found by argument-dependent lookup because the implementation I used made std::vector<int>::iterator a user-defined type defined in namespace std. But the standard only requires std::vector<int>::iterator to be an implementation specified random access iterator type. I can't find anything requiring it to be a user-defined type at all (and in fact there are reasonable implementation where it isn't), let alone a user defined type defined in a specific namespace.
Since the defining namespace of container iterators is visible to users, should the standard say anything about what that namespace is?
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2013-06-26 00:00:00 | admin | create |