Created on 2013-03-13.00:00:00 last changed 131 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N3485.
Edit [unique.ptr.single.asgn] paragraph 2:
unique_ptr& operator=(unique_ptr&& u) noexcept;[…]
-2- Effects: Transfers ownership from u to *this as if by calling reset(u.release()) followed byan assignment fromget_deleter() = std::forward<D>(u.get_deleter()).
Edit [unique.ptr.single.asgn] paragraph 6:
template <class U, class E> unique_ptr& operator=(unique_ptr<U, E>&& u) noexcept;[…]
-6- Effects: Transfers ownership from u to *this as if by calling reset(u.release()) followed byan assignment fromget_deleter() = std::forward<E>(u.get_deleter()).
[ 2013-09-29, Chicago ]
Apply to Working Paper
[ 2013-04-20, Bristol ]
Move to Ready
The Effects clauses for unique_ptr assignment don't make sense, what is the target of "an assignment from std::forward<D>(u.get_deleter())"?
Obviously it's intended to be the deleter, but that isn't stated clearly.History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-02-20 13:20:35 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++14 |
2013-09-29 10:21:48 | admin | set | messages: + msg6653 |
2013-09-29 10:21:48 | admin | set | status: voting -> wp |
2013-09-23 13:24:31 | admin | set | status: ready -> voting |
2013-04-20 08:17:49 | admin | set | messages: + msg6497 |
2013-04-20 08:17:49 | admin | set | status: new -> ready |
2013-03-17 22:05:35 | admin | set | messages: + msg6399 |
2013-03-13 00:00:00 | admin | create |