Created on 2010-10-29.00:00:00 last changed 146 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Apply the resolution proposed by the 2010-10-29 comment in 2005.
[ 2011 Bloomington ]
Consensus that this issue will be resolved by 2005, but held open until that issue is resolved.
[ 2011-03-24 Madrid meeting ]
Paolo: Don't think we can do it now.
Daniel K: Agrees.[ 2010-11-07 Daniel comments ]
This is by far not the only necessary fix within both sub-clauses. For details see the 2010-10-29 comment in 2005.
I'm seeing something strange in the paragraphs [map.modifiers] and [multimap.modifiers]: they both talk about tuple<const key_type, mapped_type> but I think they should be talking about pair<const key_type, mapped_type> because, among other reasons, a tuple is not convertible to a pair. If I replace tuple with pair everything makes sense to me.
The proposed resolution is obvious.| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-11-13 15:55:41 | admin | set | status: open -> resolved |
| 2011-08-16 23:35:18 | admin | set | messages: + msg5847 |
| 2011-03-24 16:58:37 | admin | set | messages: + msg5689 |
| 2011-03-24 16:58:37 | admin | set | status: new -> open |
| 2010-11-07 19:17:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5307 |
| 2010-11-07 19:17:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5306 |
| 2010-10-29 00:00:00 | admin | create | |