Created on 2010-10-21.00:00:00 last changed 123 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Remove [string.require]p/3:
3 No erase() or pop_back() member function shall throw any exceptions.
Add to the specifications of iterator erase(const_iterator p);, iterator erase(const_iterator first, const_iterator last);, and void pop_back(); in [string.erase]:
Throws: Nothing
[ 2014-02-13 Issaquah meeting ]
Move as Immmediate
[ 2014-02-12 Issaquah meeting ]
Jeffrey: Madrid meeting's proposed wording wasn't applied, and it's better than the original proposed wording. However, this sentence is only doing 3 functions' worth of work, unlike the similar paragraphs in [container.requirements.general]. Suggest just putting "Throws: Nothing" on the 3 functions.
[ 2011-03-24 Madrid meeting ]
Beman: Don't want to just change this, can we just say "unless otherwise specified"?
Alisdair: Leave open, but update proposed resolution to say something like "unless otherwise specified". General agreement that it should be corrected but not a stop-ship. Action: Update proposed wording for issue 2003 as above, but leave Open.Clause 21.4.1 [string.require]p3 states:
No erase() or pop_back() member function shall throw any exceptions.
However in 21.4.6.5 [string.erase] p2 the first version of erase has
Throws: out_of_range if pos > size().
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-02-27 17:03:20 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++14 |
| 2014-02-20 13:52:38 | admin | set | status: immediate -> wp |
| 2014-02-14 16:49:03 | admin | set | messages: + msg6862 |
| 2014-02-14 16:49:03 | admin | set | status: open -> immediate |
| 2014-02-13 04:51:13 | admin | set | messages: + msg6820 |
| 2011-03-24 16:58:37 | admin | set | messages: + msg5686 |
| 2010-11-13 23:03:59 | admin | set | status: new -> open |
| 2010-10-26 20:16:35 | admin | set | messages: + msg5154 |
| 2010-10-21 00:00:00 | admin | create | |