Title
Really "formatted input functions"?
Status
dup
Section
[istream.extractors]
Submitter
Dietmar Kühl

Created on 1999-07-20.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago

Messages

Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Rationale:

Duplicate: 60

Date: 1999-07-20.00:00:00

It appears to be somewhat nonsensical to consider the functions defined in the paragraphs 1 to 5 to be "Formatted input function" but since these functions are defined in a section labeled "Formatted input functions" it is unclear to me whether these operators are considered formatted input functions which have to conform to the "common requirements" from [istream.formatted.reqmts]: If this is the case, all manipulators, not just ws, would skip whitespace unless noskipws is set (... but setting noskipws using the manipulator syntax would also skip whitespace :-)

See also issue 166 for the same problem in formatted output

History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg1720
1999-07-20 00:00:00admincreate