Issue 155 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Typo in naming the class defining the class Init
Status
tc1
Section
[iostream.objects]
Submitter
Dietmar Kühl

Created on 1999-07-20.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago

Messages

msg1705 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Rationale:

Although not strictly wrong, the standard was misleading enough to warrant the change.
msg1704 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Proposed resolution:

Change [iostream.objects] paragraph 2 from "basic_ios::Init" to "ios_base::Init".
msg1703 (view)
Date: 1999-07-20.00:00:00

There are conflicting statements about where the class Init is defined. According to [iostream.objects] paragraph 2 it is defined as basic_ios::Init, according to [ios.base] it is defined as ios_base::Init.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg1705
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg1704
1999-07-20 00:00:00admincreate