Title
Synchronize the move-constructor for atomic_future
Status
nad editorial
Section
[futures.atomic_future]
Submitter
INCITS

Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 170 months ago

Messages

Date: 2010-11-02.20:30:57

[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]

Make the move constructor for atomic future lock the source

Date: 2010-10-24.03:04:13

Addresses US-204

According to the definition of atomic_future, all members of atomic_future are synchronizing except constructors. However, it would probably be appropriate for a move constructor to be synchronizing on the source object. If not, the postconditions on paragraphs 7-8, might not be satisfied. This may be applicable if a collection of futures are being doled out to a set of threads that process their value.

History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-11 19:19:17adminsetstatus: open -> nad editorial
2010-11-02 20:30:57adminsetmessages: + msg5276
2010-10-24 03:04:13adminsetmessages: + msg4970
2010-08-25 00:00:00admincreate