Title
"associated asynchronous state" must go
Status
nad editorial
Section
[futures.state]
Submitter
Switzerland

Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 168 months ago

Messages

Date: 2011-02-20.22:39:32

Proposed resolution:

The project editor may supply a more appopriate term, or use "liaison state", at his own discretion.

Date: 2010-11-01.20:45:13

[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]

Change all occurrences of "associated asynchronous state" to "liaison state".

Date: 2010-10-24.16:08:33

Addresses CH-35

The term "associated asynchronous state" is long, ugly and misleading terminology. When introduced we agreed upon that we should come up with a better name. Here it is: "liaison state". Since the state is hidden and provides synchronization of a future with its corresponding promise, we believe "liaison state" is a much better and shorter name (liaison ~ (typically hidden) relationship)

History
Date User Action Args
2011-02-20 22:39:32adminsetmessages: + msg5523
2011-01-27 12:54:11adminsetstatus: open -> nad editorial
2010-11-01 20:45:13adminsetmessages: + msg5259
2010-10-24 16:08:33adminsetmessages: + msg5043
2010-08-25 00:00:00admincreate