Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 170 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Resolved by n3197.
[ 2010-11-01 Daniel comments: ]
Accepting n3130 would solve this issue.
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]
delete p18, adjust 30.4.4 p1 and p4 accordingly
Addresses CH-27
The mutex requirements force try_lock to be noexcept(true). However, where they are used by the generic algorithms, those relax this requirement and say that try_lock may throw. This means the requirement is too stringent, also a non-throwing try_lock does not allow for a diagnostic such as system_error that lock() will give us.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-18 14:01:09 | admin | set | status: nad editorial -> resolved |
| 2010-11-11 19:19:17 | admin | set | status: open -> nad editorial |
| 2010-11-01 20:35:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5250 |
| 2010-11-01 20:35:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5249 |
| 2010-11-01 20:35:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5248 |
| 2010-10-24 16:08:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5031 |
| 2010-08-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |