Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
[ 2017-03-01, Kona ]
SG1 recommends: Close as NAD
Papers about C compatibility are welcome, but there may be more pressing issues. C threads are not consistently available at this point, so there seems to be little demand to fix this particular problem.[ 2010 Batavia ]
The concurrency sub-group reviewed the options, and decided that closer harmony should wait until both standards are published.
The LWG does not wish to make any change at this time.
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]
Remove C++0x timed_mutex and timed_recursive_mutex if that facilitates development of more compatible APIs.
Addresses US-185
Cooperate with WG14 to improve interoperability between the C++0x and C1x threads APIs. In particular, C1x mutexes should be conveniently usable with a C++0x lock_guard. Performance overheads for this combination should be considered.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-03-01 18:09:34 | admin | set | messages: + msg9027 |
| 2014-11-24 15:11:58 | admin | set | status: nad future -> lewg |
| 2010-11-18 00:17:44 | admin | set | messages: + msg5378 |
| 2010-11-18 00:17:44 | admin | set | status: open -> nad future |
| 2010-11-01 20:34:22 | admin | set | messages: + msg5245 |
| 2010-10-24 16:08:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg5029 |
| 2010-08-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |