Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 161 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Change "implementation defined" to "undefined"
[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]
Addresses GB-112
Should the effect of calling front/back on a zero-sized array really be implementation defined i.e. require the implementor to define behaviour?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-23 20:07:26 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++11 |
| 2011-05-21 21:15:19 | admin | set | messages: + msg5787 |
| 2010-10-26 13:57:17 | admin | set | status: nad editorial -> wp |
| 2010-10-24 03:04:13 | admin | set | messages: + msg4914 |
| 2010-08-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |