Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 162 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Strike 20.3.5.4 and the matching declarations in 20.3 header synopsis.
[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]
Addresses GB-85
While std::pair may happen to hold a pair of iterators forming a valid range, this is more likely a coincidence than a feature guaranteed by the semantics of the pair template. A distinct range-type should be supplied to enable the new for-loop syntax rather than overloading an existing type with a different semantic.
If a replacement facility is required for C++0x, consider n2995.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-08-23 20:07:26 | admin | set | status: wp -> c++11 |
| 2011-05-09 23:20:35 | admin | set | messages: + msg5769 |
| 2010-11-19 19:04:45 | admin | set | status: nad editorial -> wp |
| 2010-10-24 10:50:39 | admin | set | messages: + msg5000 |
| 2010-08-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |