Title
The definition of move-constructor is redundant
Status
resolved
Section
[defns.move.ctor]
Submitter
BSI

Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 163 months ago

Messages

Date: 2011-05-03.22:13:16

Proposed resolution:

Resolved by paper n3142.

Date: 2010-11-09.00:26:53

[ 2010 Batavia: resolved as NAD Editorial by adopting paper n3142. ]

Original proposed resolution preserved for reference:

Strike subclause 17.3.14, [defns.move.ctor]

17.3.14 [defns.move.ctor]
move constructor a constructor which accepts only an rvalue argument of the type being constructed and might modify the argument as a side effect during construction.

Date: 2010-10-24.00:00:00

[ 2010-10-24 Daniel adds: ]

Accepting n3142 provides a superior resolution.

Date: 2010-10-25.01:00:51

Addresses GB-51

This definition of move-constructor is redundant and confusing now that the term constructor is defined by the core language in subclause 12.8p3.

History
Date User Action Args
2010-11-18 12:46:23adminsetstatus: nad editorial -> resolved
2010-11-09 00:26:53adminsetmessages: + msg5320
2010-11-09 00:26:53adminsetstatus: open -> nad editorial
2010-10-25 01:00:51adminsetmessages: + msg5105
2010-10-24 22:33:31adminsetmessages: + msg5062
2010-10-24 10:50:39adminsetmessages: + msg4986
2010-08-25 00:00:00admincreate