Created on 2010-08-25.00:00:00 last changed 167 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Resolved by N3241
[ 2011-02-25 P/R wording superseded by N3241. ]
[ 2010-11-05 Beman provides exact wording. The wording was inspired by Dave Abrahams' message c++std-lib-28958, and refined with help from Alisdair, Daniel, and Howard. ]
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment ]
Consider putting a general statement to the same effect into clause 17.
Addresses CH-18
The general approach on moving is that a library object after moving out is in a "valid but unspecified state". But this is stated at the single object specifications, which is error prone (especially if the move operations are implicit) and unnecessary duplication.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-03-22 08:05:22 | admin | set | status: open -> resolved |
| 2011-02-25 15:54:31 | admin | set | messages: + msg5546 |
| 2010-11-14 13:10:57 | admin | set | status: nad -> open |
| 2010-11-12 19:21:15 | admin | set | status: open -> nad |
| 2010-11-05 12:33:57 | admin | set | messages: + msg5293 |
| 2010-11-05 12:33:57 | admin | set | messages: + msg5292 |
| 2010-10-24 22:33:31 | admin | set | messages: + msg5059 |
| 2010-10-24 10:50:39 | admin | set | messages: + msg4983 |
| 2010-08-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |