Proposed resolution:

Adjust the signature above [futures.atomic_future]/6 like so:

atomic_future(atomic_future<R>&& rhs);

Rationale:

Solved by N3058.

[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]

Moved to NAD EditorialResolved. Rationale added below.

[ 2009-12-12 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 5 positive votes on c++std-lib. ]

In [futures.atomic_future] this constructor:

atomic_future(future<R>&&);

is declared in the synopsis, but not defined. Instead n2997 defines:

atomic_future(const future<R>&& rhs);

and n3000 defines

atomic_future(atomic_future<R>&& rhs);

both of which are wrong. The constructor definition should be changed to match the synopsis.