Rationale:

We have in general reverted to the single swap signature taking lvalue references, which could be seen as the alternative solution to UK 314, bringing consistency to the standard.

[ Moved to Tentatively NAD after 5 positive votes on c++std-lib. ]

Addresses: UK 314

In Message c++std-lib-25529, Alisdair writes:

UK comment 314 requests rvalue swap overloads in a couple of places they were missed.

We have in general reverted to the single swap signature taking lvalue references, which could be seen as the alternative solution to UK 314, bringing consistency to the standard <g>

Either way, I no longer expect to see any work to resolve this comment - the work is complete and it should be either marked Rejected, or Accepted with Modifications (namely, removing all other rvalue swaps!)