Created on 2009-10-22.00:00:00 last changed 170 months ago
Rationale:
Solved by N3058.
[
2010 Pittsburgh: Moved to NAD EditorialResolved. Rationale added below.
]
With the addition of async(), a future might be associated with a function that is not running in a different thread but is stored to by run synchronously on the get() call. It's not clear what the wait() functions should do in this case.
Suggested resolution:
Throw an exception.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-12-05 00:09:22 | admin | set | status: nad editorial -> resolved |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg1286 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg1285 |
| 2009-10-22 00:00:00 | admin | create | |