Created on 1998-02-23.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago
Rationale:
Not a defect. The LWG believes that the Standard is already clear. See [container.requirements], paragraph 8.
I couldn't find a statement in the standard saying whether the allocator object held by a container is held as a copy of the constructor argument or whether a pointer of reference is maintained internal. There is an according statement for compare objects and how they are maintained by the associative containers, but I couldn't find anything regarding allocators.
Did I overlook it? Is it an open issue or known defect? Or is it deliberately left unspecified?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg30 |
| 1998-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | create | |