Issue 1156 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Constraints on bitmask and enumeration types to be tightened
Status
nad
Section
[enumerated.types][bitmask.types]
Submitter
LWG

Created on 2009-06-28.00:00:00 last changed 172 months ago

Messages

msg944 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

Rationale:

UK NB did not sufficiently describe how to resolve their comment, and therefore we cannot make a change for the FCD. If a resolution were provided in the future, we would be happy to apply it.

msg943 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]

Moved to NAD. Rationale added.

msg942 (view)
Date: 2010-10-21.18:28:33

[ 2009 Santa Cruz: ]

Move to Open. Ping Robert Klarer to provide wording, using N2235 as guidance.

msg941 (view)
Date: 2009-06-28.00:00:00

Addresses UK 165

Description

Constraints on bitmask and enumeration types were supposed to be tightened up as part of the motivation for the constexpr feature - see paper N2235 for details

Suggestion

Adopt wording in line with the motivation described in N2235

Notes

Robert Klarer to review
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg944
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg943
2010-10-21 18:28:33adminsetmessages: + msg942
2009-06-28 00:00:00admincreate