Created on 2009-03-22.00:00:00 last changed 172 months ago
Proposed resolution:
Strike [multimap.modifiers] entirely (but do NOT strike these signatures from the class template definition!).
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
Mark as NAD, solved by removing concepts.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
We agree with the proposed resolution.
Move to Review.
[ Beman adds: ]
Pete is clearly right that this one is technical rather than editorial.
Addresses UK 246
The content of this sub-clause is purely trying to describe in words the effect of the requires clauses on these operations, now that we have Concepts. As such, the description is more confusing than the signature itself. The semantic for these functions is adequately covered in the requirements tables in [associative.reqmts].
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg678 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg677 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg676 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg675 |
| 2009-03-22 00:00:00 | admin | create | |