Created on 2009-03-11.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago
[ Summit: ]
Agree in principle, but not with the proposed resolution. We believe it belongs either a subsection of either [utilities] or [memory] as part of the general reorganization of [utilities]. The declaration should stay in <memory>.
Addresses UK 212 [CD1]
The pointer-safety API is nothing to do with smart pointers, so does not belong in [util.smartptr]. In fact it is a set of language support features are really belongs in clause [language.support], with the contents declared in a header that deals with language-support of memory management.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg357 |
| 2009-03-11 00:00:00 | admin | create | |