Created on 2009-03-11.00:00:00 last changed 164 months ago
[ 2009-10 Santa Cruz: ]
Mark NAD as suggested.
[ Post Summit, Alisdair adds: ]
Paper N2843 proposes an extension to the [[align]] attribute that further diminishes the need for this template. Recommend NAD.
[ Summit: ]
Agree. The need for aligned_union is compelling enough to reinstate.
Addresses UK 204 [CD1]
It is not possible to create a variant union based on a parameter pack expansion, e.g. to implement a classic discriminated union template.
Original proposed resolutuion:
Restore aligned_union template that was removed by LWG issue 856.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg352 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg351 |
| 2010-10-21 18:28:33 | admin | set | messages: + msg350 |
| 2009-03-11 00:00:00 | admin | create | |