Created on 2004-09-14.00:00:00 last changed 138 months ago
See Core issue 476.
Discussed in Rapperswil 2014. EWG thinks there's no design defect here, and suggests that a placement array new should not have such implementation-defined overhead. EWG suggests that CWG should clarify that placement array new T[n] needs n*sizeof(T) bytes of memory, and clarify that an operator delete must only be called if the corresponding operator new has been called. Ask James Dennett/Chandler Carruth for any more feedback.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-07-01 21:57:43 | admin | set | status: open -> nad |
| 2004-09-14 00:00:00 | admin | create | |