Title
N4086, N3981 Removing trigraphs??!, N4210 IBM comment on preparing for a Trigraph-adverse future in C++17
Status
wp
Section
[lex.phases]
Submitter
Richard Smith

Created on 2014-05-06.00:00:00, last changed 2014-11-21.17:12:23.

Messages

Date: 2014-11-21.17:12:23

http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n4086.html

http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n4210.pdf

http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n3981.html

The paper contains the proposed wording.

Discussed in Rapperswil 2014. IBM continues to oppose.

Straw poll:

SF 9, WF 6, N 6, WA 3, SA 2.

Another poll, no neutral option:

SF 10, WF 9, WA 3, SA 3.

Deprecate/Remove/Status Quo, three-way poll:

5/16/6. Removal is still by far the strongest.

The proposal goes forward to CWG. CWG has already reviewed it and designated it ready for voting in Urbana.

Adopted into the working draft in Urbana, as N4086.

History
Date User Action Args
2014-11-21 17:12:23adminsetstatus: ready -> wp
2014-07-01 21:57:43adminsetstatus: open -> ready
2014-05-06 00:00:00admincreate