Created on 1999-02-23.00:00:00 last changed 262 months ago
Proposed resolution (10/00:
Change text in Clause 14 [except] paragraph 2 from:
A goto, break, return, or continue statement can be used to transfer control out of a try block or handler, but not into one.to:
A goto or switch statement shall not be used to transfer control into a try block or into a handler.
[ Example:void f() {—end example ]
goto l1; // Ill-formed
goto l2; // Ill-formed
try {
goto l1; // OK
goto l2; // Ill-formed
l1: ;
} catch (...) {
l2: ;
goto l1; // Ill-formed
goto l2; // OK
}
}
A goto, break, return, or continue statement can be used to transfer control out of a try block or handler.
(See also issue 246.)
At the top of clause 15, in paragraph 2, it says:
A goto, break, return, or continue statement can be used to transfer control out of a try block or handler, but not into one.What about switch statements?
switch ( f() ) { case 1: try { g(); case 2: h(); } catch (...) { // handler } break; }Daveed Vandevoorde:
Consider:
void f() { try { label: ; } catch(...) { goto label; } }Now the phrase "try block" (without a hyphen) is used in paragraph 1 in a way that causes me to think that it is not intended to include the corresponding handlers. On the other hand, the grammar entity "try-block" (with hyphen) does include the handlers. So is the intent to prohibit the above or not?
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2003-04-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> tc1 |
2000-11-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg456 |
2000-11-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2000-05-21 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> ready |
2000-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
1999-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | create |